Expert of Swedish Nuclear Regulator Shares Experience in Oversight and Supervision
The issues related to safe operation of nuclear power plants (NPP) have always been and will remain relevant for Ukraine. There are 15 operating power units, producing over 50% of electricity in the country.
Ukraine ranks the ninth in the world and the fourth in Europe according to the number of nuclear reactors. In this regard, great attention is paid to nuclear and radiation safety in the state. Experts in this field highly evaluate the experience of European countries, learn new technologies and introduce respective regulations.
Uatom.org editorial board succeeded to communicate with Tage Eriksson, leading expert of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM), on how Sweden manages to regulate nuclear energy safety, what problems NPP operators face and how they overcome them. In addition, especially for the Uatom.org website, the interview presents the experience in decommissioning of Swedish NPPs, thermal power uprates and purchase of nuclear fuel from four suppliers.
Tage Eriksson, expert of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority
– Tage, how long have you been working for the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority?
– The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority was established on 1 July 2008 by merger of the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate and the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority. I joined the team of the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate in 2007, and later worked at SSM for ten years. Now I am going to retire. I have been working in the field of nuclear energy for a very long time.
– What nuclear facilities are currently operated in Sweden?
– Eight power units at three nuclear power plants are currently operated in Sweden.
The first commercial nuclear power plant in Sweden was Ågesta NPP. It was constructed in the 1960s. It has been closed, but not yet decommissioned. The nuclear power plant was operated to generate electricity and supply heat in the region.
Ringhals and Oskarshamn NPPs were constructed a little later and Barsebäck and Forsmark NPPs after them.
Four units at Ringhals NPP, three units at Oskarshamn NPP, two units at Barsebäck NPP and three units at Forsmark NPP were constructed. Thus, 12 power units were constructed to produce exceptionally electric power.
Barsebäck NPP unit 1 was closed in 1999 and unit 2 in 2005. Decommissioning of these has just started.
Two power units were closed year 2017, Oskarshamn NPP units 1 and 2. Unit 2 was closed prematurely: it was under upgrading, but this was too expensive and it was decided to close the power unit exclusively for economic reasons.
Eight operating units remain currently in Sweden: four units at Ringhals NPP, one unit at Oskarshamn NPP and three units at Forsmark NPP.
– What types of reactors are operated at NPP?
– Ringhals NPP unit 1 is a BWR (boiling water reactor) and units 2, 3 and 4 are PWRs (pressurized water reactors).
Oskarshamn NPP unit 3 and all three power units at Forsmark NPP are BWRs.
– What challenges are most often faced by the Swedish nuclear power plants? How do you solve them?
– The most common challenges are equipment aging and wear. In the second case, when equipment replacement is not technically feasible, this is a very serious challenge.
As regards equipment ageing, I can provide an example of rather serious problems that occurred at one of the Ringhals NPP units where the containment lost its tightness due to corrosion in the metal lining. As a result, the operator had to replace not only the lining but also the concrete covering the metal lining.
– Does Sweden have experience in NPP long-term operation?
– Swedish NPPs do not have a fixed lifetime. This lifetime is established in some countries, which is 30 or 40 years. Accordingly, the lifetime is included into the operation license. The Swedish equivalent of a “license” does not include a fixed lifetime.
At the same time, all Swedish nuclear power plants are regularly subjected to IAEA safety assessment programs “Safe Aspect of Long Term Operation” (SALTO). SSM supervises this area very actively.
– Do you have experience in decommissioning?
– In this case, I should start with research reactors.
In the late 1940s and in the early 1950s, Sweden began to think whether to develop nuclear industry and start thorough research in the field. As a result, a positive decision was made, after which the construction of several research nuclear reactors was started.
The first nuclear reactor was commissioned at the Royal Institute of Technology. Today, the reactor has been completely decommissioned.
Then the Studsvik research site was constructed and many research reactors were placed on it. Some of the reactors have been decommissioned, and the largest reactor R-2 is under decommissioning.
As I already mentioned, Barsebäck NPP units 1 and 2 were closed in 1999 and 2005, respectively. Today, the nuclear power plant has received an authorization for decommissioning. A part of the internal structures has been already dismantled.
Summing up, I will say that Sweden has now experience in decommissioning of both research reactors and commercial reactors, since decommissioning of the two power units at Barsebäck NPP is ongoing.
– What funding source is used for NPP decommissioning?
– According to Swedish legislation, the plant operator should pay fee to the Nuclear Waste Fund in proportion to the electric energy delivered.
Year 2017 the fee was 0.04 SEK per kWh.
SSM is authorized to monitor the allocation of costs to the Fund, determine the fee amount and supervise storage of costs.
If necessary, the operator applies to the Nuclear Waste Fund to receive the necessary amount for power unit decommissioning. A final decision is made by the regulator (SSM) and the payment is administered by Nuclear Waste Fund.
– Does Sweden have experience in NPP operation in daily load-following mode?
– We have no experience of operation in daily load-following mode.
Nevertheless, we have experience in weekly load-following mode, which we call the pre-programed mode. For example, all factories are closed on weekends and the electricity production should be reduced. Therefore, we reduce electricity production at nuclear power plants. On the contrary, electricity production increases on Monday. Therefore, we successfully manage the electricity production process.
– You probably have an appropriate authority to coordinate this process?
–Yes, of course. We have the Swedish National Grid Authority (Svenska Kraftnät), which is responsible for energy balance in the grid. Agreements are made on a continuous basis between the Swedish National Grid Authority and NPP operators on how to control the production of electricity.
– Discussions are now underway in Ukraine regarding possible power uprates of national NPPs. Is this practice used in Sweden? Is it justified in terms of safety?
– The practice of power uprate has been implemented at most Swedish power units. The power uprates ranges from about 10%, up to about 30% (e.g. Oskarshamn NPP unit 3) compared to original design.
If the operator wants to implement a power uprate, it basically has to submit an application to the regulator (SSM) and the Land and Environmental Court with safety case and detailed arguments and amend the safety analysis report and the environmental impact analysis. If the regulator and the Land and Environmental Court have no comments, the operator obtains an authorization for power uprate. However, in practice the procedure of authorization is conducted in several steps.
– Tage, are post-Fukushima measures taken at Swedish NPPs?
– After the Fukushima accident, the European Commission authorized the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG) to develop technical specifications and methods to assess the ability to overcome events similar to the Fukushima accident.
ENSREG Group identified a list of safety improvement measures to be implemented at NPPs in each country. Sweden received about 60 positions for implementation of safety improvement measures.
Swedish nuclear power plants have already implemented some measures to improve safety in accordance with the ENSREG technical specifications, but there are also those that require further implementation.
Safety improvement measures will not be taken in full scope at Ringhals NPP units 1 and 2, which are to be closed in 2019 and 2020.
– What is the funding source for post-Fukushima measures?
– The operator includes the costs into the tariff.
– Do you have a special commission to set the tariff for electricity?
– No, we do not. Sweden has a deregulated electric energy market.
If the buyer is not satisfied with the price for electricity, it can easily replace one supplier by another.
– How long the free energy market has been functioning in Sweden?
– About 15-20 years. We have a common electric energy market with Nordic countries. We have a unified electric power supply system (i.e. a common AC super grid) with Norway, Finland and part of Denmark.
– Tage, are research reactors operated in Sweden?
– No research reactors are operated in Sweden at present. However, it does not mean that we do not conduct any research in this area.
The research of nuclear material continues at dedicated universities of Sweden and at the Royal Institute of Technology. As far as I know, Studsvik Nuclear AB had recently a joint research project with Ukraine.
– How many nuclear fuel suppliers are there in Sweden?
– At present, Swedish NPP’s use four suppliers: AREVA (manufacturing in France), General Electric Company (manufacturing in USA), Westinghouse Electric Company (manufacturing in Sweden), as well as TVEL (manufacturing in Russia).
– Do you have any challenges with TVEL fuel?
– Prior to operation, the NPP operator properly tested several assemblies. Some minor drawbacks were revealed e.g. some tightening bolts were loosened because of vibration. Nevertheless, the problem was solved. To date, SSM considers TVEL fuel quite suitable for Swedish NPP units, as well as the fuel fabricated by the other manufacturers.
– Tell us about Westinghouse, nuclear fuel fabrication plant. Is it convenient to have such a facility on the territory of Sweden?
– The Westinghouse Nuclear Fuel plant in Sweden is a part of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (now owned by Toshiba). As the regulator, we have no reasons not to trust them.
As for location of the plant on the territory of Sweden, this is not important for the nuclear regulator. The regulators job is to monitor the reliability and quality of fuel so that it meets all safety requirements.
– Does Sweden have the full cycle for fabrication of fuel assemblies?
– No, Sweden does not mine or enrich uranium. The fuel producer is chosen by the operator. If the operator requires nuclear fuel, it should ask the Westinghouse plant to fabricate it and buy enriched uranium in advance from different countries e.g. Canada or Russia.
– Do you think that Ukraine should build its own fuel fabrication plant? Would Sweden buy assemblies fabricated in Ukraine?
– I can answer this question only as a private person, but not as an SSM representative.
I think that Swedish NPP operators will continue to consider the purchase of fuel assemblies from different suppliers. However, not only the price, but also the quality and support services will be analyzed very carefully, including computer codes to justify the safety of fuel implementation. If the Swedish NPP operator is satisfied with all these factors, Ukraine will surely have a chance.
Uatom.org Editorial Board